Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: size of TableSpace and Performance

Re: size of TableSpace and Performance

From: <michael_bialik_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 20:17:23 GMT
Message-ID: <7n59s4$6uc$1@nnrp1.deja.com>


Hi.

 You are correct, but when working with a number of disks  you have an additional security by spreading your  control files and redo logs.

  Michael.

In article <19990720214055.01911.00000446_at_ng-fv1.aol.com>,   dbaoracle_at_aol.com (DBAOracle) wrote:
> There are certain cases though that 1x18 might be better than 18x1
FS's... Some
> LVM's will stripe the data for you and there may be cacheing issues
as well
> (Veratos is one example). We tested one large file system vs. several
smaller
> ones and, all other things being =, got better performance out of the
one large
> one, allowing the OS Software to stripe for us... Part of the reason
was we
> ended up with a larger cache avalible for read/write on that file
system.
>
> Robert
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't. Received on Wed Jul 21 1999 - 15:17:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US