Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: What would be faster BEQ or TCP to Localhost?

Re: What would be faster BEQ or TCP to Localhost?

From: nooruddin <nooruddin76_at_telebot.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:57:49 +0530
Message-ID: <7mdket$5mt$1@news.vsnl.net.in>


As far my knowledge goes using tcp-loopback is better than the rest because its a widely used protocol , but others like bequeath are also same as far as performance is concerned

oamador_at_obipr.jnj.com wrote in message <7m3e8b$r7e$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>...
>How should one configure the protocol in easy config for an application
>that runs on the same server where the database is running. Should it
>use Bequeath or TCP and localhost for the server address? Which one is
>faster? Is there any limitation with either protocol? I'm not familiar
>with the performance of Bequeath.
>
>TIA.
>
>Orlando M. Amador
>CIM Programmer
>Ortho Biologics
>oamador_at_obipr.jnj.com
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Received on Mon Jul 12 1999 - 05:27:49 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US