Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Rumours

Re: Rumours

From: Pete Sharman <psharman_at_us.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 10:02:05 -0700
Message-ID: <377CF08C.A2A69A04@us.oracle.com>


Sure. The file is http://www.oracle.co/year2000/2000/white2000.pdf, or you can just go to the Oracle home page, click on Year 2000 on the right side of the page, then click on Product Compliance to get to it.

HTH. Pete

Kenneth C Stahl wrote:

> Can you give us a url for the Y2K paper? I would like to review it so that I can
> make recommendations to my group.
>
> Ken
>
> Pete Sharman wrote:
>
> > Jonathan
> >
> > I can understand the frustration here. It's always annoying to be told one
> > thing and then another. Do you have official documentation on the message
> > you've been delivered? The reason I ask is I think we're looking at two
> > different issues here and that may cause confusion. One is what versions are
> > Y2K compliant (I always type complaint for that and then have to fix it - I
> > wonder if that's "Freudian fingers"?!), and the other is officially supported
> > versions. If you look at the Y2K paper on Oracle's web site, it specifically
> > says:
> >
> > "...desupported versions of Oracle7, starting with 7.1 and higher, are Year
> > 2000 compliant, although they do have known issues that may affect some users
> > and therefore should be considered."
> >
> > If you have something documented from Oracle that says otherwise, we need to
> > fix it. Maybe it could be logged as a documentation bug? ;)

--
Regards

Pete


Received on Fri Jul 02 1999 - 12:02:05 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US