Re: Rumours

Can you give us a url for the Y2K paper? I would like to review it so that I can make recommendations to my group.

Ken

Pete Sharman wrote:

> Jonathan
>
> I can understand the frustration here. It's always annoying to be told one
> thing and then another. Do you have official documentation on the message
> you've been delivered? The reason I ask is I think we're looking at two
> different issues here and that may cause confusion. One is what versions are
> Y2K compliant (I always type complaint for that and then have to fix it - I
> wonder if that's "Freudian fingers"?!), and the other is officially supported
> versions. If you look at the Y2K paper on Oracle's web site, it specifically
> says:
>
> "...desupported versions of Oracle7, starting with 7.1 and higher, are Year
> 2000 compliant, although they do have known issues that may affect some users
> and therefore should be considered."
>
> If you have something documented from Oracle that says otherwise, we need to
> fix it. Maybe it could be logged as a documentation bug? ;)
Received on Fri Jul 02 1999 - 07:35:56 CDT