Re: anyone have exp w/raw vs. jfs on IBMRS6000 SP2

From: Christopher M. Day <christopher.day_at_rdbms.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:18:50 +0100
Message-ID: <37715D4A.43F59049@rdbms.freeserve.co.uk>

Dan,

Not surprised, seems to consistent across jfs type filesystems ie Veritas - might be worth checking http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk for his comparison article.

Chris

"Daniel P. Considine" wrote:
>
> Oracle doc touts raw for performance vs jfs
> and it is also required for OPS with 7.3.4 and earlier
> but i am dubious since our jfs dbs are getting better i/o truput than
> our raw ones
>
> assume same database str file system not withstanding
>
> thanks for your time
>
> Dan Considine
> Global Information Systems
Received on Wed Jun 23 1999 - 17:18:50 CDT