Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: HP-UX 10.20: VxFS log v. delaylog and FS blocksize

Re: HP-UX 10.20: VxFS log v. delaylog and FS blocksize

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:18:51 +0100
Message-ID: <929907002.4346.0.nnrp-06.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>


For the best effect with JFS (as VxFS is called on HPUX) you need the advanced JFS option installed so that you can choose the direct io option.

There is an article on Raw vs FS on my web site which includes some notes on using JFS on HP which might give some help.

--

Jonathan Lewis
Yet another Oracle-related web site: www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

benryan_at_my-deja.com wrote in message <7kj7e0$kv9$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>...
>I have an Oracle 7.3.4.4 OLTP db using Unix filesystems to hold
>datafiles etc.
>
>Under HP-UX 10.20 you can specify the blocksize that VxFS (default 1K).
>Does anyone know of any literature relating to seeting the FS blocksize
>for an Oracle database. (e.g. if the database block size is 4K should
>the FS blocksize be 4K too?)
>
>Second question relates too the VxFS option for log or delaylog. Again
>which is appropriate for an Oracle Database files?
Received on Sun Jun 20 1999 - 14:18:51 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US