Re: SQL server Vs Oracle

From: Abbot Cooper <cooper_NoSpam_ab_at_mediaone.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:51:55 -0400
Message-ID: <7h76be$gnc$1@usenet49.supernews.com>

From the "amazing but true" department... Win98 needs a patch in order to be Y2K compliant. The patch was released within the past few weeks I think.

--
Abbot Cooper
cooper_NoSpam_ab_at_mediaone.net
Remove "_NoSpam_" before sending

Stefan Skoglund wrote in message <3734D847.E7DD1A9E_at_ebox.tninet.se>...
>Steve wrote:
>> Windows locks up or GPFs or does strange things, and we shake it off as
>> "oh, it's Windows". We buy new releases and accept the fact that they
will
>> be buggy until we apply the numerous service releases. And for the
totally
>> disasterous releases, like Access 95, we just wait until the new version
>> comes out. We, the consumer, have been lead to believe that bugs, major
>> bugs, are "normal", and we should expect software to have them.
>>
>
>Hmm, i wonder how many upgrades from Win95 to 98 MS sold
>to people who wanted something which would survive year 2k related
>problems ??? Win95 with current patches is i think Y2k safe now.
Received on Mon May 10 1999 - 12:51:55 CDT