Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Help: Settle an argument regarding EXTENTS

Re: Help: Settle an argument regarding EXTENTS

From: Andrew Babb <andrewb_at_mail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 23:27:38 +0800
Message-ID: <3703906A.4FCA7A3B@mail.com>


Thomas,

I ran a test on Oracle8 v8.0.5 and NT 4.0 (sp4), and although I was able to create a tablespace at 6Gb (6000004k) (4K Block Size), the largest single extent that I could build was 2Gb (2000000k), for both Initial and Next. Is there a limit that a single extent can accommodate, along the lines of 2^32.

AtDhVaAnNkCsE
Andrew

BTW - I was running on NTFS.

Thomas Kyte wrote:

> A copy of this was sent to jdbeckerle_at_usa.net
> (if that email address didn't require changing)
> On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 23:27:11 GMT, you wrote:
>
> >I have read this discussion with great interest, and will read the
> >Cary Millsap paper shortly, but let me put out this simple question:
> >
> >Does anyone know the maximum size of an extent in Oracle 7.3.4 on
> >Windows NT 4.0?
> >
> >The only documentation I can find is that files are limited to
> >2**22 blocks, or 8GB for 2k blocks. But I can't seem to make
> >an extent larger than 2047MB.
> >
>
> For example, on NT with 8.0.4:
>
> Oracle block size: 16 Kb
> Maximum blocks per datafile: 4 million
> Maximum datafiles per database - depends on block size
> - 20,000 datafiles for 2 Kb Oracle block size
> - 40,000 datafiles for 4 Kb Oracle block size
> - 65,536 datafiles for >= 8 Kb Oracle block size
> Largest datafile: 64 Gb (assuming 16 Kb Oracle block size)
> Largest database: 4 Pb (Petabytes
>
> In 7.3, it was smaller.
>
> Do you have any files >2gig on your system. An extent must fit in a file.
>
> >I will now go read the paper to find out why I shouldn't even bother trying.
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >In article <922869420.14576.0.nnrp-07.9e984b29_at_news.demon.co.uk>,
> > "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Van Messner wrote in message ...
> >> > A single extent of 60gig is probably not a good idea.
> >> > He probably has always built tables as he says, and that was standard
> >> > thinking until maybe six months ago.
> >>
> >> That's a sad reflection on how slowly people learn.
> >> I've been making this point in presentations for
> >> the many years, people have been announcing it
> >> in this newsgroup for at least the last 2 years,
> >> and the Cary Millsap paper you may be thinking
> >> of is dated March 7th 1996 and that says:
> >> (I quote):
> >>
> >> More and more people have learned that
> >> multiple extents bear negligible performance
> >> impact upon all Oracle DML operations.
> >> .......
> >> The number of distinct extent sizes in a given
> >> tablespace should be small; for example, only
> >> one. If there is more than one extent size in a
> >> tablespace, then all those extent sizes are
> >> integral multiples or divisors of each other.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Jonathan Lewis
> >> Yet another Oracle-related web site: www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
> >>
> >>
> >
> >-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>
> Thomas Kyte
> tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
> Oracle Service Industries
> Reston, VA USA
>
> --
> http://govt.us.oracle.com/ -- downloadable utilities
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle Corporation
Received on Thu Apr 01 1999 - 09:27:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US