Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAW vs. Std. FileSystem

Re: RAW vs. Std. FileSystem

From: David Sisk <davesisk_at_ipass.net>
Date: 1998/11/26
Message-ID: <Q0V62.713$kx1.630@news.ipass.net>#1/1

Note quite correct. OPS runs against shared disk, whether raw or cooked.

--
David C. Sisk
http://www.ipass.net/~davesisk/ORACLEonNT.htm


Oracle wrote in message <73flun$rbs$1_at_oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...

>(1) performance is 20% better than normal devices
>(2) the only choice for parrellel sever.
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>A couple of questions.
>>
>>1. Is it true that most of the worlds VLDBs use RAW devices to store the
>>physical files?
>>2. Does Oracle recommend RAW devices for VLDBs?
>>
>>Any input welcome.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Rowan.
>>--
>>The opinions expressed are mine and not of my company.
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 26 1998 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US