Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Full Table Scans

Re: Full Table Scans

From: Roman Gelfand <rgelfand_at_masmid.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 09:32:56 -0500
Message-ID: <72hfq9$9ls$1@news.monmouth.com>


Yes, it turns out you are right. The table was parallelized and multiblock read count was high. After reducing multiblock read count and removing the parallelization, index was used.

Thanks
Ken Geis wrote in message <364A4DDC.24CA8AAD_at_cchemnt.cchem.berkeley.edu>...
> I can't believe that it does. You should post the results of an
>EXPLAIN PLAN. Note that sorting without indexes is not trivial for a
>large table.
>
>Ken
>
>
>Roman Gelfand wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to execute a select statement querying against a single table
>> without a where clause and sorting by two columns.
>>
>> Can anyone tell me why does this statement causes recursion when
executed?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Roman
Received on Fri Nov 13 1998 - 08:32:56 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US