Re: DB_BLOCK_BUFFERS under NT

From: <hr784_at_cleveland.freenet.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 18:13:52 GMT
Message-ID: <6utscv$8d$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

It will also depend on how much cache memory you have. Too high of a db_block_buffers setting coupled with your block size and shared pool size will bring your server to its knees.

David Knollhoff

In article <6ucp1k$s80$1_at_cbu.pvtnet.cz>, "Pavel Polcar" <pavel.polcar_at_berit.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
> Oracle8 Getting Started Release 8.0.4 for Windows NT (Appendix B) says it's
> 3200 for Oracle8.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Pavel Polcar
>
> Greg Deuel wrote in message ...
> >A basic question. Is there a limit to the number of db_block_buffers that
> >can be assigned under NT 4.0 with either Oracle 7.3.x or 8.x?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >- Greg
> >
> >Greg Deuel
> >gdeuel_at_frxsoft.com
> >
> >
>
>

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own Received on Wed Sep 30 1998 - 13:13:52 CDT