Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: optimal RAID configuration

Re: optimal RAID configuration

From: Matthias Gresz <GreMa_at_t-online.de>
Date: 8 Sep 1998 10:16:36 GMT
Message-ID: <6t3064$tpq$1@news01.btx.dtag.de>


MotoX schrieb:
>
> I'd question a bit of your reply (and some of it I didn't quite understand,
> so jump in if I've misinterpreted what you said):
>
> Gijs Wuyts wrote in message <35f05a90.3466604_at_news.skynet.be>...
> >I've posted a similar request 2 months ago, and basically got this.
> >Todays RAID solutions allow a good throughput, both read and write,
>
> Er, *maybe*. Be careful. Many manufacturers use large caches to achieve the
> figures they quote, and many of these are not battery-backed. A power
> failure could completely screw up your db, so check before you buy/install.
> And a large db with large operations can easily negate the cache.

Always use the write through otpion! Don't rely on batteries since you don't know wether thy'll function when your system is running since 2 years. What about peaks and noices on the power line? Can your battery backup deal with this?

>
> >albeit no as with a stand alone drive with each and every one of the
> >drives coupled to there own controller, and by dividing the different
> >parts of oracle (rollback, logs, datafiles, redo...) you can gain
> >optimal performance.
>
> Well, you wouldn't really have a 1 to 1 mapping between drives and
> controllers, that's overkill (and expensive). Striped drives will give you a
> good boost for the type of system you seem to have in mind - read heavy,
> datamart/datawarehouse style. This can be done non-RAID, or as RAID0. If you
> also want some degree of fault-tolerance, you'll need to mirror those
> stripe-sets, either by 'mirroring' hardware or software, or RAID1. A good
> RAID controller with let you run RAID0+1, which is both striped-mirrored
> drives. Again, check before you buy.
>
> Having said all that, RAID5 (which tends to have a write penalty) may be
> fine. Get a controller(s) on loan and *test* a few configurations on you
> *own* system. That's the only way you will truly know. No-one else can
> answer the question for you, as every system is different.
>
> >
> >Check out Adaptecs site on there AAA133 raid solution. not the
> >cheapest, but it's a good bet, I've put my money ( and my career as a
> >DB1/2A on it...)
>
> I've used the Adaptec stuff and quite like it. You might also want to look
> at some complete, one-box solutions (EMC, etc) if your budget will go that
> far.
>
> >
> >Gijs
> >On Fri, 04 Sep 1998 15:51:18 -0400, Daniel Nigrin
> ><nigrin_d_at_a1.tch.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> MotoX.

--

Regards

Matthias Gresz :-)

--
Matthias.Gresz_at_Privat.Post.DE

          /|
         / |        
        /| |\
       /||  |\
      / O    |\         
     |        |\ Galopping Horse beats Running Man.
    /          |\
   /      /     |\
  /    __/|      |\
  \°   /  |       |\
   \/_/   |        |\

Received on Tue Sep 08 1998 - 05:16:36 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US