Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Sybase ASA vs MS Access vs MS SQL Server

Re: Sybase ASA vs MS Access vs MS SQL Server

From: Ng K C Paul <paulkcng_at_news.netvigator.com>
Date: 1998/09/02
Message-ID: <6sigho$99f$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com>#1/1

So, if I want my database is portable, then I should choose ASA rather than ASE, right?

John Barton (jsbarton_at_home.com) wrote:
: The database files are portable across platforms ie. windows, dos, nt, unix.
:
: The real point is that the Adaptive Server Anywhere is much easier to
: administer and therefore you see it embedded in many other products. The
: latest version just started shipping on Win32 and now supports SMP so it
: can also scale up in workgroup environments. The Windows CE platform
: is currently in beta and they also have it working on the Palm Pilot in
: alpha.
: Someone at the Powerbuilder user group that I attend said they are using
: ASA in a 80 user workgroup environment with no problems.
:
: John
:
: Ken Ho wrote:
:
: > Ng K C Paul wrote:
: >
: > > Sybase ASA is much scalable than Microsoft Products at present moment.
: > > It can run from Windows CE to Windows 9x to Windows NT to UNIX.
: > >
: >
: > You uses an wrong word.. it is more portable..
: >
: > Ken
:
Received on Wed Sep 02 1998 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US