Re: Redo logs only useful if archiving on

From: <shreterh_at_my-dejanews.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 05:31:02 GMT
Message-ID: <6mi5qm$8r1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

Having no trouble with archivelogging, except that we still need to work out archivelog space problems (need to adjust our scripts). Sometimes a large job takes us by surprise and creates tons of redo. As I say, we're still working it out. Anyone else have experience to share on archive log and large jobs?

In article <358bebe7.39103848_at_192.86.155.100>, tkyte_at_us.oracle.com wrote:
>
> >For those of you running in archive log mode, is it working well or
> >is it so cumbersome that its not worth the trouble? Would cold-backups
> >be sufficient?
>
> It is not cumbersome at all, its pretty easy actually. It is *more then well
> worth the trouble*. If you can afford to lose data, then you can skip using
> archive log mode. If you cannot afford to lose data, then archive log mode is
> the only way to go.
>
> Why do you think it is cumbersome?
>
> Thomas Kyte
> tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
> Oracle Government
> Herndon VA
>

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading Received on Sun Jun 21 1998 - 00:31:02 CDT