Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Unix File System vs. Raw Devices

Re: Unix File System vs. Raw Devices

From: Steve Phelan <stevep_at_XXnospamXX.toneline.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 16:06:26 +0100
Message-ID: <894553570.22855.0.nnrp-03.c2de712e@news.demon.co.uk>


Er, be careful here, Thomas. I've seen many installations with caching disk controllers, where the cache has not be set to 'write-thru'. My advice is always use a UPS anyway, they are so cheap. Rebuilding you Oracle db from scratch may not be so cheap.

>Thomas Kyte wrote in message <35517659.5607853_at_192.86.155.100>...
>Oracle caches modified data blocks and uses DBWR to flush them in the
background
>however, log file writes are not cached -- they are force written
(fsync'ed) to
>the file system. DBWR and LGWR work together to ensure that sufficient
data
>exists in either the datafiles on disk or the online redo log files to
perform
>crash recovery.
>
>A UPS is a good idea for many reasons but not needed to prevent data loss.
The
>database takes care of that.
>
>
>Thomas Kyte
>tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
>Oracle Government
>Herndon VA
Received on Thu May 07 1998 - 10:06:26 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US