Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 7.3 not Y2K compliant on Digital Unix?

Re: Oracle 7.3 not Y2K compliant on Digital Unix?

From: Eric Junkermann <eric_at_deptj.demon.co.uk>
Date: 1998/05/05
Message-ID: <354ed170.4495584@news.demon.co.uk>#1/1

On 4 May 1998 14:38:12 GMT, "Saad Ahmad" <saad.ahmad_at_mchugh.com> wrote:

>They might be referring to issues like:
>SYS SQL> desc v$transaction
> Name Null? Type
> ------------------------------- -------- ----
> ADDR RAW(4)
> XIDUSN NUMBER
> XIDSLOT NUMBER
> XIDSQN NUMBER
> UBAFIL NUMBER
> UBABLK NUMBER
> UBASQN NUMBER
> UBAREC NUMBER
> STATUS VARCHAR2(16)
> START_TIME VARCHAR2(20) <<<------
>
>SYS SQL> update dual set dummy = dummy;
>SYS SQL> select start_time from v$transaction;
>START_TIME
>--------------------
>05/04/98 09:38:03
>SYS SQL> rollback;
>
>But I won't sweat over it.
>

This is **not** a Y2K issue - selecting a date field from anywhere gets you the default format (which defaults to 2 digit year but can be changed) unless specified otherwise. If you want a 4-digit year, specify it and it will be correct.

To go back to the original post, a 3rd party supplier is no more likely to be right than anyone else. Ask them for their reasons, and then get them independantly evaluuated (here would be good).

Regards,

Eric Received on Tue May 05 1998 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US