Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Poor documentation choice in HTML

Re: Poor documentation choice in HTML

From: TurkBear <johng_at_mm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 20:47:20 GMT
Message-ID: <3548e307.25399422@news2.mm.com>


I'll add my agreement to that--- I can't even get mine to work...the Next link fails and I only get the original page and maybe one more.... are there any docs for the docs....?

peter.schneider_at_okay.net (Peter Schneider) wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Apr 1998 01:25:01 GMT, root_at_virginia.edu wrote:
>
>>Does anyone else feel that the HTML documentation supplied with
>>Oracle8 is difficult to use?
>>
>>Printing, searching, navigating... HTML seems a step in the wrong
>>direction when compared to the pdf format they were using.
>
>
>I couldn't agree more. The HTML docs are a major pain, even the old
>Oracle Book documentation format was *much* better than HTML. And the
>java information navigator is way too slow. IMHO, HTML was not made
>for documents of this size and complexity. I think Oracle would do
>best if they included the pdf docs as well for *all* products.
>
>Peter
>
>--
>Peter Schneider
>peter.schneider_at_okay.net
Received on Thu Apr 30 1998 - 15:47:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US