Re: Oracle performance on Windows NT - is it really so bad?!

We are also using an HP Pentium Pro 200 with 96 mb of RAM. Using a test database with around 50 tables, of which a couple had over 1.5 million rows of data, we were able to (using Visual Basic 5.0) return a dozen rows in about a second, maybe a little less. It screams!

Brad

Matthew Chappee <matthew_at_nospam.mattshouse.com> wrote in article <350fefd7.180567952_at_ntserv02>...
> We're using a Pent Pro 200 with 100Mg Ram and NT 4.0 and Oracle runs
> like a dream.
>
> Matthew
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 14:03:17 +0100, aroesch <aroesch_at_raie.de> wrote:
>
> >We migrated our Oracle database to Windows NT to get a hand on
> >performance behaviour. We figured out that even on a $20K Intel Server
> >with 256 MB RAM Oracle seems to be terribly slow!
> >
> >Is this what the world expierences using NT as a backend operating
> >system - or are we just to dump to install Oracle on NT right? By the
> >way, a comparisson with an old $3K Sun Sparc with 128 MB RAM reveiled
> >that this machine is yet faster than NT!
> >
> >Any commnets to this?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 19 1998 - 00:00:00 CST