Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: ODBC vs SQL Net with 7.3... How big an overhead ????

Re: ODBC vs SQL Net with 7.3... How big an overhead ????

From: Lando <MarkL_at_quebim.com>
Date: 1998/01/22
Message-ID: <34C79B2C.FDD24698@quebim.com>#1/1

ODBC uses sqlnet to communicate with an Oracle database. So either way you look at it you still need sqlnet.

M.Landa

Guy Thibault wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> We are using MFC (C++) on Win95 client with ODBC (intersolv) to access
>
> our
> Oracle workgroup server (NT). Since we once beleive that we might be
> using other
> RDBMS we have used ODBC... Now we are planning a new release and I was
>
> wondering just how big an overhead is caused by the used of ODBC
> instead
> of
> a SQL net connexion???
>
> Does any one know of benchmarks? Or has anyone done some testing? We
> are
>
> having some slow response time when we insert thousands of rows (600k
> and up).
> Since using Sql net instead of ODBC is a rather expensive move I am
> wondering
> if it worth it??? Which explains my quest for data ;-)
>
> I'll appreciate any help.
>
> Thanks
>
> Guy Thibault
> gthibaul_at_globetrotter.qc.ca
Received on Thu Jan 22 1998 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US