Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: tune for INSERT performance?

Re: tune for INSERT performance?

From: Karl E. Jørgensen <kjorg_at_msn.com>
Date: 1997/12/27
Message-ID: <#fxvRVsE9GA.217@upnetnews03>#1/1

You don't need to recreate the whole database to increase the log file size; you can probably even get away with this during normal on-line hours (depending on load).

Just add a couple of log file with the size you want, force a couple of log switches and delete the old ones:

SQLDBA> alter database add logfile 'whatever-filename-you-like' size 20M;
SQLDBA> alter database add logfile 'another-filename-you-like' size 20M;
SQLDBA> alter system switch logfile;
SQLDBA> alter system switch logfile;
SQLDBA> alter database drop logfile 'name-of-old-logfile';
SQLDBA> alter database drop logfile 'name-of-other-old-logfile';

the syntax varies a bit if your are running with multiple members of each group.

if you're in doubt about the names of your log files, then check the V$LOG table.

And don't forget to update your backup, so the next time you make a cold backup, you back up the new log files :-)

Hope this helps

--
Karl
Oracle Certified DBA


Gregg Sporar wrote in message <34A00853.67949CED_at_i2.com>...

>Thomas Kyte wrote:
>
>> You should look at your log files to see how large (or small) they are.
You
>> might have the default 512k log files which are way too small. Look in
the file
>> \orant\rdbms73\trace\{$ORACLE_SID}alrt.ora and see if you have any
"checkpoint
>> not complete..." type of messages. These indicate that log files are not
sized
>> appropriately for the amount of work you want to do. Try increasing the
log
>> files.
>>
>
>It looks like this may be where the problem is: we do have the default size
log
>files and lots of those "checkpoint not complete..." messages. My thanks
to you and
>all the others who responded; I'll recreate the database after the holidays
and
>start the testing over again.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Gregg Sporar
>i2 Technologies
>
>
Received on Sat Dec 27 1997 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US