Re: trace file help

It is a bug in Solaris version of Oracle for which I believe they dont have a patch
till 7.3.2.2.I am not sure about 7.3.2.3 Later versions on Sun OS seems to work fine.

Michael E. Moores <moores_at_digitech.net> wrote in article <879877090.8633_at_dejanews.com>...
> i keep getting this oracle trace file every couple of weeks.
> i am having trouble identifying system events that may be causing it.
> can someone help out here?
> all i can deduce is that libsocket fails for some reason..
> --michael
>
> -------------------------
> PL/SQL Release 2.3.2.0.0 - Production
> ORACLE_HOME = /dbms/app/oracle/product/7.3.2
> System name: SunOS
> Node name: jatoba
> Release: 5.5.1
> Version: Generic
> Machine: sun4u
> Instance name: FPRD
> Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
> Oracle process number: 13
> Unix process pid: 4011, image: oracleFPRD
>
> Tue Nov 18 09:32:09 1997 Tue Nov 18 09:32:09 1997 *** SESSION ID:(7.333)
> 1997.11.18.09.32.09.000 ksedmp: internal or fatal error ORA-00600:
> internal error code, arguments: [12333], [95], [48], [198], [], [], [ ],
> [] ----- Call Stack Trace ----- Cannot read symbol in
> /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1. calling call entry argument values in hex
> location type point (? means dubious value) --------------------
> -------- -------------------- ---------------------------- ksedmp()+188
> CALL ksedst()+0 95C2BC ? 95C2B8 ? 9B5330 ? 95C2CC ? 95C2E0 ? EFFFE0B4
> ? kgesiv()+644 PTR_CALL 3 ? 3 ? 1EC7B0 ? 302D ? 270F ? EFFFE674 ?
> ksesic3()+88 CALL kgesiv()+0 9C67F0 ? 9CF700 ? 302D ? 3 ? 9C6864 ?
> A1116C ? opitsk()+1420 CALL ksesic3()+0 302D ? 0 ? 5F ? 0 ? 30 ? 0 ?
> opiino()+776 CALL opitsk()+0 9B5330 ? 0 ? 9C8250 ? 9C8298 ? 0 ? A ?
> opiodr()+4900 PTR_CALL 3C ? 4 ? EFFFFCE0 ? 9B5330 ? 1072C ? 9C8240 ?
> opidrv()+2224 CALL opiodr()+0 3C ? 4 ? EFFFFCE0 ? 0 ? EFFFFA7C ? 1 ?
> sou2o()+52 CALL opidrv()+0 3C ? 4 ? EFFFFCE0 ? 6C6F6700 ? 0 ?
> EFFFFD0D ? main()+320 CALL sou2o()+0 EFFFFCF0 ? 3C ? 4 ? EFFFFCE0 ?
> 9E5988 ? 0 ? _start()+92 CALL main()+0 2 ? EFFFFE9C ? EFFFFEA8 ?
> 9E2800 ? 1 ? 0 ?
>
> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
>
Received on Tue Dec 09 1997 - 00:00:00 CST