Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: PC server vs. Sun server
"David Russell" <user_at_msn.com> wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's the first time I have heard anyone make that claim. Very certainly I have found Oracle on NT to be slower than on Solaris. I haven't been able to make comparisons with the same hardware though. A small Oracle database with 20 concurrent (client/server) users crawls on NT on a dual CPU 128 Meg RAM Compaq Proliant.
A 10 Gig Database with usually 150 concurrent users gives < 2 second response times on a Sun 1000e with 512 Meg and 4 X 50 Meg CPUs (yes, 50 Meg CPUs).
Even our smaller databases on Sparc 10s and 20s are faster than the small NT one.
]
]Oracle 8 uses more memory than Oracle 7 so be sure to size memory correctly
]and most large systems I have encountered have I/O bottlenecks rather than
]CPU. So be sure to calculate your I/O through put requirements and compare
]them with what the Hardware can achieve.
]
]Regards
]David Russell
-- ,-,_|\ George Dau, __ / * \ Unix (Solaris, DEC Unix, Linux), NT, Oracle, Internet. (OO) \_,--\_/ Home: gedau_at_pobox.com Work: gedau_at_mim.com.au ( \/ ) v WWW: http://pobox.com/~gedau W--W Food for spambots: webmaster_at_SendAd.com suggest_at_SendAd.com onwave_at_mlmail.com chrysties_at_mymail.com postmaster_at_anka.von.mute.de dan_at_netinstrument.com justdoit_at_ultra-mail.com osg_at_online-success.com mrk_at_sympatico.ca chandar_at_powerup.com.au 18384_fred_at_ultra.net TALN_at_andromeda.jaycounty.com MANAGER1_at_MLMPRO.NET market_at_smithparnell.com gameZONE_at_letterbox.com cheq2_at_hotmail.com sales_at_morbrandnames.com quu93_at_flashnet.it jlm_at_ic-asia.com FREE_at_lexus.hkg.com ace_at_max.net mankani_at_singnet.com.sg PEEL_at_sis-ltd.com CEO_at_sis-ltd.com putpeel_at_putpeel.com 195_mail_at_earthlink.net BdavidC_at_aaanews.com tootoogood_at_hotmail.com Remove_at_iemmc.orgReceived on Sat Dec 06 1997 - 00:00:00 CST