Re: What do you think about this database architecture ?

First of all, Can you tell me why you are using row device instead of UFS - Unix File System...?

Reji

Nuno Martins wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i has informed that my 4x2GB disks will be replaced by 3x4GB disks . In
> that disks i have 2 databases :
> - one for production in 3 disks ( very important )
> - the other for test and little desenv.
>
> I plan to do this :
>
> disk1 disk2 disk3
> log1_gp1 log2_gp1 system_tb(RD)
> log1_gp2 log2_gp2 temp_tb(RD)
> data_tb(RD) index_tb(RD) rbs_tb(RD)
> all_db_test
> archived_logs
> (RD) row device
>
> I have another disk where oracle is installed where i can put the
> archived logs .
>
> My concern is performance and rapid recovery .
>
> Another possibility is to distribut the tablespace data and index in
> disk1 and disk2 ( one datafile in each ) to balance IO but this increase
> the time of recover .
>
> Am i right ? Thas anyone have another sugestion or opinion?
>
> Thank you
>
> Nuno
Received on Sun Jun 22 1997 - 00:00:00 CDT