Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: www.microsoft.com sure needs a lot of silicon
In article <Pine.SUN.3.96.970507102645.18519A-100000_at_access5.digex.net>,
REX BALLARD <rballard_at_access5.digex.net> writes:
:>
:>
:> On Wed, 7 May 1997, R!ch wrote:
:>
>> On Wed, 7 May 1997, REX BALLARD wrote: >> >> A lot of nice reasoning snipped, for brevity. I must contest this, howver: >> >> > Finally, Sun alienated the rest of the Unix Consortium, creating rival >> > OSF/1 and encouraging customers to "hold out" for OSF/1. By the time >> > OSF/1 arrived (1992), Microsoft was announcing that Windows NT, a "better >> >> Actually, it was DEC and friends that created the OSF, in response to >> Sun and AT & T joining forces (for SVR4 I believe). Although some nice >> technologies emerged, I think the split was a big mistake.
>> I just wish that all the UNIX vendors would stop the infighting (for the >> timebeing, anyway!), and unite against the common enemy: Micro$oft. >> Hopefully, Java will provide the tool to do this...
I think Linux is going to hurt the big name unixes more and more in the near future. They may not be able to compete and to be honest I think they deserve everything they get.
I mean why bother with Sun or Dec if you can do the same job for a fraction of the price on a PC running Red Hat or Caldera Linux? SCO is already feeling the pinch.
Linux is cutting across all the markets. PC, low-med Unix. The big problems will start when Oracle & the other major DB vendors start to release the Linux versions of their flagship products.
-- Archeus Free FRPG - http://www.geocities.com/Area51/3002/ Colin Smith (colin_at_mellifluous.europe.dg.com) My opinions are completely my own, bought and paid for.Received on Thu May 08 1997 - 00:00:00 CDT