Re: Enterprise vs. Workgroup

Allen Lucas wrote:
>
> We are running a relatively small shop and have decided on Win NT vs.
> HP/UNIX.
>
> This decision made, we are considering the differences between the
> Enterprise server vs. the workgroup server. We will need the
> replication features of Enterprise, and I am under the assumption the
> assyncronous replication does not exist on the Workgroup server. Can
> anybody confirm this?

I don't think so, so why not confirm with Oracle Sales People ?

> Also, we would like to establish a hardware solution with redundant
> servers which could cover for each other in a disaster recovery
> situation. Can we run both the Enterprise and Workgroup versions on the
> same physical box? The box will be a Compac Proliant 5000 with I
> believe 4 CPUs.

In what way you redundant Oracle Server.

> We currently have memory leak occuring within a Delphi Application which
> is using 7.2.X Oracle workgroup server and 2.2.X version of SQL*Net. We
> upgraded to 2.3.X version of SQL*Net and the memory leak dropped to 30%
> of the original leak, yet still existed. If anybody has had this in the
> past, please let me know. Our next step is to try and move to Oracle
> 7.3.X to bring the SQL*Net and Oracle in sync. We hope this addresses
> the memory leak.

Always the problem, only improving, that's Oracle. Received on Mon Apr 14 1997 - 00:00:00 CDT