Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Size of datafiles - performance impact?

Re: Size of datafiles - performance impact?

From: Mark Bairden <fl71_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: 1997/02/04
Message-ID: <5d89hi$3k5@cronkite.cisco.com>#1/1

Remember that aside from performance issues you also have maintenance issues. Don't oversize files if you think you may at some point have to reorganise them. The larger they are the more downtime you'll need to get the job done.

Mark B.
tdrudy_at_ix.netcom.com wrote:

>Tim Nimmo wrote:
>>
>> Andy Hardy <aph_at_ahardy.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
>> <mDnNUAAV4j6yEwVV_at_ahardy.demon.co.uk>...
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've a 10Gb database in which each datafile is approx 1.5Gb (Solaris 2.4
>> > system, Oracle 7.1.6).
>> >
>> > As we're running on a Sun HA-Cluster with a RAID Array 'optimised' for
>> > enquiry, I assume that the datafiles are being nicely striped across all
>> > available disks and that I don't need to consider the actual position of
>> > the datafiles.
>> >
>> > However, does the size of my datafiles have an impact on Oracle itself
>> > e.g. can it handle many-smaller datafiles easier than fewer-larger ones?
>> >
>> > Just an idle thought,
>> >
>> > Andy
>> > P.S Please email replies, as well as posting to this group - my ISP
>> > seems to be missing some news.
>> > Andy Hardy (Internet: aph_at_ahardy.demon.co.uk, CIS: 100015,2603)
>> > PGP key available on request
>> > ===============================================================
>> > Life is a game of bridge - and you've just been finessed.
>> >
>>
>> This brings to mind the saying "It's not the size that counts, but how you
>> use it". <g>
>>
>> Size isn't a factor on performance, but analyzing the types of typical
>> queries issued against the database and allocating Oracle resources
>> properly will make all the difference in the world.
>>
>> Tim Nimmo...
 

>Tim
 

>Respectfully, size is always a factor when considering performance,
>but I'm a bit too lazy today to enumerate fully. When doing CRUD,
>would you think that any rdbms will do any CRUD function as fast on a
>5 column, 5 row, fixed length rdbms as it would on a 100 col, 1,000,000
>row, varchar2 rdbms? You can optimize performance if you buy more
>CPUs and more RAM and optimize the underlying OS' kernel (assuming
>a UNIX system), and of course in many other ways.
 

>I agree that the size/number of CRUD activities would also make
>a significant difference.
 

> Tom
Received on Tue Feb 04 1997 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US