Re: Displaying 'umlaut' character
From: Frank van Bortel <fbortel_at_home.nl>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:28:04 +0200
Message-ID: <517a2$4c9f6685$524ba3af$23268_at_cache3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
On 09/22/2010 03:29 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2010-09-22 08:13, Frank van Bortel<fbortel_at_home.nl> wrote:
>> Apart from what I replied earlier, the correct way to encode
>> is of course "ö" (without the quotes...)
>
> That's not *the* correct way, just *a* correct way. Encoding it in the
> charset indicated in the Content-Type header or a meta tag is equally
> correct (and preferrable in most cicumstances, IMHO).
>
> hp
>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:28:04 +0200
Message-ID: <517a2$4c9f6685$524ba3af$23268_at_cache3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
On 09/22/2010 03:29 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2010-09-22 08:13, Frank van Bortel<fbortel_at_home.nl> wrote:
>> Apart from what I replied earlier, the correct way to encode
>> is of course "ö" (without the quotes...)
>
> That's not *the* correct way, just *a* correct way. Encoding it in the
> charset indicated in the Content-Type header or a meta tag is equally
> correct (and preferrable in most cicumstances, IMHO).
>
> hp
>
would you please read the HTML definition?
-- Regards, Frank van BortelReceived on Sun Sep 26 2010 - 10:28:04 CDT