Re: Displaying 'umlaut' character

From: Dr.Ruud <rvtol+usenet_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:40:26 +0200
Message-ID: <4c9b3caa$0$41117$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>



On 2010-09-23 03:13, Jürgen Exner wrote:
> Frank van Bortel<fbortel_at_home.nl> wrote:

>> Apart from what I replied earlier, the correct way to encode
>> is of course "&ouml;" (without the quotes...)
>
> If that were true then I guess we wouldn't need Unicode and all the
> gazillion other attempts to represent non-English letters.

Non-English? The trema (diaeresis) is often used: cooperate reenact zoology Brontë naïve. (Umlaut diacritics are not.)

-- 
Ruud
Received on Thu Sep 23 2010 - 06:40:26 CDT

Original text of this message