Re: Pinning Objects

From: ddf <>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>

On Jul 20, 11:57 am, The Magnet <> wrote:
> Hi,
> We want to pin a couple of tables, hoping to increase some
> performance.  From the docs, a pinned table means less reads from
> disk, etc.
> If the table gets updated or inserted into, is there any advantage to
> this?  If yes, how does the committed transactions get saved?

Why do you not consider using the KEEP pool?

David Fitzjarrell Received on Mon Jul 20 2009 - 12:35:23 CDT

Original text of this message