Re: V$ Views
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <abcc2ffb-6a5a-4bd8-aacd-11671117b332_at_j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On May 27, 10:13 am, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 11:42 am, a..._at_unsu.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <abcc2ffb-6a5a-4bd8-aacd-11671117b332_at_j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On May 27, 10:13 am, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 11:42 am, a..._at_unsu.com wrote:
>
> Which release of Oracle are you using? My example was run on
> 11.1.0.6.0; running on 10.2.0.3.0 produces similar results:
That's why I punted on this one :-) I seem to recall even oracle couldn't get it straight as to when it changed definitions, not to mention things like bug 7580277.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. "According to V$SESSION_LONGOPS this query has been running since 1988. "Received on Wed May 27 2009 - 12:44:07 CDT