Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: SQL possible equivalent

Re: SQL possible equivalent

From: Jeff Kish <jeff.kish_at_mro.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:37:00 -0400
Message-ID: <fu2r53lo4jv58qg4sm3qlh2bkl0913frdu@4ax.com>


<snip>
>There is generally no valid reason to drop and recreate tables in
>production code. If you need a work table then you either use a
>permanent table that is truncated either directly before or after each
>use or a global temporary table which is defined only once and used
>when needed.
>
>The need for work tables is itself usually questionable. The non-
>blocking nature of the Oracle locking and read consistency model plus
>the ability of Oracle to handle complex queries generally allows
>removing work tables from the process.
>
>HTH -- Mark D Powell --

The reason is to handle a reinstall of a failed install for a product. The script is run by an installation application. thanks
Jeff Kish Received on Wed May 30 2007 - 09:37:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US