Re: Need help : degrading performance in record updates

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:10:10 +0200
Message-ID: <f26v6d$vnb$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

EscVector schreef:

> Well, you did ask... :) Sorry!

Just being grumpy - sorry.

> My question would be do they mean 100k*25.
That would be my understanding, now that I know they meant 2,500,000 records. Which is nothing, really, and loads on my 5 year old PC in about 5 minutes.

-- Regards, Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFGRwAiLw8L4IAs830RAv/SAJ9HxBh4C3rG6CgMrfsozxtwCY2ERACdGedl bruZtHlDhNatQAF6TH8/LiI=
=PRGb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Sun May 13 2007 - 07:10:10 CDT