Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Need help : degrading performance in record updates

Re: Need help : degrading performance in record updates

From: EscVector <Junk_at_webthere.com>
Date: 12 May 2007 15:24:09 -0700
Message-ID: <1179008649.750094.131370@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>


On May 12, 6:07 am, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> EscVector schreef:
>
> >> What a lakh record anyway?
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakh
>
> Yeah - I'm aware of the fact I can look it up, it just pisses
> me off I have to.
> This is an international forum, with English as the language
> to communicate.
> In spite the fact, English is not the mother tongue of many
> visitors -including me- it would be proof of dignity and respect
> to try an abide by rules of the language.
> Lakh is *not* an english word.
> - --
> Regards,
> Frank van Bortel
>
> Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFGRZHcLw8L4IAs830RAllkAJ9Dto/WgyEJUBne1BggJWaALh8TqwCfSGfm
> zcnqmXEWQYEkzwZDc0zqFNQ=
> =6eye
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Well, you did ask... :) Sorry!

My question would be do they mean 100k*25. Received on Sat May 12 2007 - 17:24:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US