Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Help ORA-07445: Struck again

Re: Help ORA-07445: Struck again

From: <pankaj_wolfhunter_at_yahoo.co.in>
Date: 24 Mar 2007 09:23:37 -0700
Message-ID: <1174753417.464256.308420@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>


On Mar 24, 9:13 pm, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:
> pankaj_wolfhun..._at_yahoo.co.in wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 3:02 pm, sybra..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> >> On 24 Mar 2007 00:28:13 -0700, "pankaj_wolfhun..._at_yahoo.co.in"
>
> >> <pankaj_wolfhun..._at_yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> >>> On Mar 24, 11:22 am, "nirav" <shiva..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Can someone point me a loop hole in my current procedure
> >>>>> or some better way of writing the following procedure
> >>>>> or do i need to contact Oracle support time?
> >>>>> let me know if something else is required
> >>>>> >From Alert.log:
> >>>>> Errors in file /home/udump/psnorad1_ora_24885.trc:
> >>>>> ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ldxeti()+20] [SIGSEGV]
> >>>>> [Address not mapped to object] [0x0] [] []
> >>>> Oracle's documentation(Oracle9i Database Error Messages) gives
> >>>> following info:
> >>>> ORA-07445 exception encountered: core dump [string] [string] [string]
> >>>> [string]
> >>>> [string] [string]
> >>>> Cause: An operating system exception occurred which should result in
> >>>> the
> >>>> creation of a core file. This is an internal error.
> >>>> Action: Contact Oracle Support Services.
> >>>> So the action is only &only to contact the Oracle support. Now if you
> >>>> do a search on Oracle Metalink , you may get lucky and get some
> >>>> hint..but this is not sure..so ur best bet is to get to oracle support.
> >>> Thanks Nirav. But still is there a possibility that if I modify my
> >>> code is some way
> >>> or apply a new patch then the error can be omitted.
> >>> I am asking this because the works fine on some applications and
> >>> also goes through when executed on 10g.
> >>> Just confirming.........?
> >> As you are still on 9.2.0.1 why wouldn't you just patch to 9.2.0.8?
> >> Because you have no support? or because you are using a free copy of
> >> Oracle for production purposes, so you can't patch?
>
> >> --
> >> Sybrand Bakker
> >> Senior Oracle DBA- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Thanks Sybrand, Nariv.
> > We can patch to 9.2.0.8. Just wanted to confirm that upgrading to a
> > new patch
> > is the only way.
> > Thanks again.
>
> It isn't the only way but it certainly the smart way as the first
> thing Oracle will likely tell you, after asking for an RDA, is that
> you apply the patches.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damor..._at_x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks Morgan. That assurance was what I needed. Neways, I tried to modified the code and now its working fine. Will recommend my seniors to upgrade to new patch as suggested. Thanks Again. Received on Sat Mar 24 2007 - 11:23:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US