Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: ORA-13249

Re: ORA-13249

From: Robbert van der Hoorn <reply_at_forum.only>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:33:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4523d45a$0$4526$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

"ennio" <ennioj_at_libero.it> schreef in bericht news:1159975931.086175.32010_at_i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Robbert van der Hoorn wrote:
>> "ennio" <ennioj_at_libero.it> schreef in bericht
>> news:1159974315.069540.137610_at_e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Robbert van der Hoorn wrote:
>> >> "Robbert van der Hoorn" <reply_at_forum.only> schreef in bericht
>> >> news:4523adcf$0$4526$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Vladimir M. Zakharychev" <vladimir.zakharychev_at_gmail.com> schreef
>> >> > in
>> >> > bericht news:1159769948.535945.67090_at_b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ennio wrote:
>> >> >>> hi I have occured in this error ;
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> SQL> SELECT/*+ INDEX (montane, mont_idx)*/ A.id id,B.id id FROM
>> >> >>> montane
>> >> >>> A,montan
>> >> >>> e B where SDO_NN (a.geom,b.geom,'sdo_num_res=1',1)='TRUE';
>> >> >>> SELECT/*+ INDEX (montane, mont_idx)*/ A.id id,B.id id FROM montane
>> >> >>> A,montane B w
>> >> >>> here SDO_NN (a.geom,b.geom,'sdo_num_res=1',1)='TRUE'
>> >> >>> *
>> >> >>> ERRORE alla riga 1:
>> >> >>> ORA-13249: SDO_NN cannot be evaluated without using index
>> >> >>> ORA-06512: a "MDSYS.MD", line 1723
>> >> >>> ORA-06512: a "MDSYS.MDERR", line 17
>> >> >>> ORA-06512: a "MDSYS.PRVT_IDX", line 9
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> but montane table has a spatial index .....
>> >> >>> also similar function like SDO_WITHIN regulary works
>> >> >>> ......
>> >> >>> I can do?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No Oracle version/patchset level, no platform information, no DDL
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> the table nor index... It's hard to tell what might be causing this
>> >> >> error without additional detail.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> Vladimir M. Zakharychev
>> >> >> N-Networks, makers of Dynamic PSP(tm)
>> >> >> http://www.dynamicpsp.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > To ensure the correct results, NO non-spatial indexes should be used
>> >> > on
>> >> > the table that contains the search column. (you force your
>> >> > statement
>> >> > not to use the spatial index)
>> >> >
>> >> > And I think you should use the +ORDERED hint as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > Did you register your index in the indexes-view?
>> >> >
>> >> > Robbert van der Hoorn
>> >> > OSA it BV
>> >> > The Netherlands
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> By the way, your A and B colums are in wrong order.
>> >> The spatial index should be on the SECOND parameter (since you use the
>> >> same
>> >> table twice, that's always correct) but also on the FIRST table in the
>> >> where
>> >> clause, so either switch your params or your where clause.
>> >>
>> >> SELECT
>> >> /*+ ORDERED*/
>> >> A.id id,B.id id FROM montane A,montane B
>> >> where SDO_NN (b.geom,a.geom,'sdo_num_res=1',1)='TRUE'
>> >>
>> >> And what are you trying to do here? Find all pairs close to each
>> >> other?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Robbert van der Hoorn
>> >> OSA it BV
>> >> The Netherlands
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > So i must drop the non spatial index that are in the table montane?
>> > and yes i want to find all pairs close to each other,
>> > It's only a trial to try the operator
>> >
>>
>> NOOOOOOOOO! Don't drop it! Just don't use a hint with it!
>>
>> Robbert
>
>
> But don't work also i if don't use a hint
>

Did you 1) put in the ordered hint 2) swap your parameters? Received on Wed Oct 04 2006 - 10:33:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US