Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: ORA-13249

Re: ORA-13249

From: ennio <ennioj_at_libero.it>
Date: 4 Oct 2006 08:32:11 -0700
Message-ID: <1159975931.086175.32010@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>

Robbert van der Hoorn wrote:
> "ennio" <ennioj_at_libero.it> schreef in bericht
> news:1159974315.069540.137610_at_e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Robbert van der Hoorn wrote:
> >> "Robbert van der Hoorn" <reply_at_forum.only> schreef in bericht
> >> news:4523adcf$0$4526$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> >> >
> >> > "Vladimir M. Zakharychev" <vladimir.zakharychev_at_gmail.com> schreef in
> >> > bericht news:1159769948.535945.67090_at_b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> ennio wrote:
> >> >>> hi I have occured in this error ;
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> SQL> SELECT/*+ INDEX (montane, mont_idx)*/ A.id id,B.id id FROM
> >> >>> montane
> >> >>> A,montan
> >> >>> e B where SDO_NN (a.geom,b.geom,'sdo_num_res=1',1)='TRUE';
> >> >>> SELECT/*+ INDEX (montane, mont_idx)*/ A.id id,B.id id FROM montane
> >> >>> A,montane B w
> >> >>> here SDO_NN (a.geom,b.geom,'sdo_num_res=1',1)='TRUE'
> >> >>> *
> >> >>> ERRORE alla riga 1:
> >> >>> ORA-13249: SDO_NN cannot be evaluated without using index
> >> >>> ORA-06512: a "MDSYS.MD", line 1723
> >> >>> ORA-06512: a "MDSYS.MDERR", line 17
> >> >>> ORA-06512: a "MDSYS.PRVT_IDX", line 9
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> but montane table has a spatial index .....
> >> >>> also similar function like SDO_WITHIN regulary works
> >> >>> ......
> >> >>> I can do?
> >> >>
> >> >> No Oracle version/patchset level, no platform information, no DDL for
> >> >> the table nor index... It's hard to tell what might be causing this
> >> >> error without additional detail.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Vladimir M. Zakharychev
> >> >> N-Networks, makers of Dynamic PSP(tm)
> >> >> http://www.dynamicpsp.com
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > To ensure the correct results, NO non-spatial indexes should be used on
> >> > the table that contains the search column. (you force your statement
> >> > not to use the spatial index)
> >> >
> >> > And I think you should use the +ORDERED hint as well.
> >> >
> >> > Did you register your index in the indexes-view?
> >> >
> >> > Robbert van der Hoorn
> >> > OSA it BV
> >> > The Netherlands
> >> >
> >>
> >> By the way, your A and B colums are in wrong order.
> >> The spatial index should be on the SECOND parameter (since you use the
> >> same
> >> table twice, that's always correct) but also on the FIRST table in the
> >> where
> >> clause, so either switch your params or your where clause.
> >>
> >> SELECT
> >> /*+ ORDERED*/
> >> A.id id,B.id id FROM montane A,montane B
> >> where SDO_NN (b.geom,a.geom,'sdo_num_res=1',1)='TRUE'
> >>
> >> And what are you trying to do here? Find all pairs close to each other?
> >>
> >>
> >> Robbert van der Hoorn
> >> OSA it BV
> >> The Netherlands
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So i must drop the non spatial index that are in the table montane?
> > and yes i want to find all pairs close to each other,
> > It's only a trial to try the operator
> >

>

> NOOOOOOOOO! Don't drop it! Just don't use a hint with it!
>
> Robbert

But don't work also i if don't use a hint Received on Wed Oct 04 2006 - 10:32:11 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US