joel garry schreef:
> Frank van Bortel wrote:
>> DA Morgan schreef:
>>> That is about as horrible a definition as I can imagine. I can't think
>>> of a single justification for either the 64K extents or a pctincrease
>>> that is anything except 1.
>>>
>> And what would be wrong with 64kB extents?
>
> Each one needs to be mapped in tables in the system tablespace for DMT.
> With extreme growth, those tables have extent problems. Some people
> would even use unsupported methods to fix them, as opposed to
> recreating the db.
>
> jg
Ah - yes, and altering sql.bsq to change storage clauses...
--
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Sat Sep 09 2006 - 04:26:41 CDT
