Re: Oracle vs. Microsoft in analysis languages

Dino Hsu wrote:

> Of course, I don't mean SQL Server 2005's BI is perfect, (I am still
> verifying by studying) the issue is it has limited front-end tools, but
> the trend looks promising.

Well if you can use the trend, others call if vapourware, to do your reporting right this minute by all means do so. I usually find that the currently installed toolset works better.

But hey ... what could possibly be wrong with a version 1.0 product from Microsoft. ;-)

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)