Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Surrogate vs. Natural Primary keys

Re: Surrogate vs. Natural Primary keys

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:16:52 -0700
Message-ID: <1129241797.905786@yasure>


Bruce G. wrote:
> I am stuck in the middle between developers and a DBA. The developers
> feel that every table in a database needs to have a surrogate primary
> key generated by a sequence and a unique index assigned to any possible
> natural keys in order to eliminate redundancy.

The developers are incompetent and should be trained or terminated.

And I'll bet a Starbuck's latte' originally trained in SQL Server.

Ignore them.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Thu Oct 13 2005 - 17:16:52 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US