Oracle FAQ

Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: two tables, one result set, but no join!

Re: two tables, one result set, but no join!

From: <andrewst_at_onetel.com>
Date: 31 May 2005 09:10:44 -0700
Message-ID: <1117555844.485182.324100@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Paul wrote:
> andrewst_at_onetel.com wrote:
>
> >Use UNION.
>
>
> Wouldn't UNION ALL be better in case there are duplicates?

What would be the point of having duplicates? What would be the point of having duplicates?

;-) Received on Tue May 31 2005 - 11:10:44 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: andrewst_at_onetel.com: "Re: two tables, one result set, but no join!"
Previous message: Raj: "Re: two tables, one result set, but no join!"
In reply to: Paul: "Re: two tables, one result set, but no join!"
Next in thread: Paul: "Re: two tables, one result set, but no join!"
Reply: Paul: "Re: two tables, one result set, but no join!"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US