Re: PLSQL vs SQL Parser

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:54:58 -0700
Message-ID: <1114732263.338091@yasure>

Sybrand Bakker wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:38:18 -0700, DA Morgan
> <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>

>>And why are you using a paleolithic, unsupported, version of Oracle for
>>anything?

>
>
> Come on, Daniel, half the world is still using 8i!!
> And you damn well know that, because several people have explained
> that to you before.
> You are more and more acting like the typical (Georg Bush-like)
> arrogant American, who thinks that the world and America are the same.
> Please wake up and stop trolling, they are definitely not, and boy
> that is good!!!
>
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

What Hans said ... the reference was to 8.0 not 8i. The breakdown is something like this:

7.x Jurasic
8.0 Paleolithic
8i Neolithic

Just kidding.

I know much of the world is still using 8i. Heck a certain very large aerospace company is still running a little 5.0 on Apollos. ;-)

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

Received on Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:54:58 CDT