Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: RMAN vs EXP/IMP

Re: RMAN vs EXP/IMP

From: Frank van Bortel <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:05:31 +0100
Message-ID: <d09tbc$usu$1@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>


DA Morgan wrote:
> Vince <vincent@ wrote:
>

>>> Exports are *not* valid backups; it's just the logical structure,
>>> a backup is about the physical structure.
>>
>>
>>
>> what do u mean by 'not' valid backup? Is the logical way not as a good 
>> result as physical ?
>> what does it restore, then?
>>
>>> Apart from that - I'd like to see anything as fast as RMAN: it
>>> *knows* Oracle (and skips empty blocks, to name something)

>
>
> Exports have never been considered a valid backup. You may be able
> to 'recover' to the export itself ... but you'll not be applying
> archive logs for anything that happened after the export took place.
> There are other issues too all documented at http://tahiti.oracle.com.
Ah - completely forgot that argument...
An export will only "recover" up to the moment, the export was made.
-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Received on Fri Mar 04 2005 - 09:05:31 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US