Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: SQL Question

Re: SQL Question

From: Sybrand Bakker <sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:00:15 +0100
Message-ID: <ntvgs0513pf4qfqnmi7b3lffsihbknhhqp@4ax.com>


On 21 Dec 2004 11:47:49 -0800, "Bill Mill" <bill.mill_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>The result I want looks like:
>
>obj_id type site_id
>1 A 101
>2 C 102
>3 B 101
>4 B 101
>5 B 102
>6 A 103
>7 A 103
>
>Do I need to use PL/SQL to achieve this?

You would, unless you redesign your tables. Your problem is not so much lack of SQL knowledge, but you are also lacking on fundamentals of relational databases. Relational databases are about sets. A set, as a mathematic concept, does not have any order. Consequently B 101 doesn't come 'after' A 101, and you are assuming there is a specific order which in reality doesn't exist at all, or won't exist anymore once you start inserting and updating records. Your thinking is clearly 3GL-oriented.
So your's the choice:
either you rectify your design, by adding an ordering number to your table, or
you start hacking yourself out with PL/SQL

--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Tue Dec 21 2004 - 14:00:15 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US