On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:22:28 +0000 (UTC), weberm_at_polaris.net
(Ubiquitous) wrote:
>AK <ak_tiredofspam_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:> > I don't want to gaps in the sequence.
>:>
>:> Then use a method that serializes on a table.
>:> Sequences guarantee uniqueness not completeness.
>:
>: I'd concur. For instance, Oracle comes with built in message queueing,
>: which comes very handy when you don't want gaps.
>:
>: But what is wrong with having gaps in your situation?
>
>One word. Auditors.
>
>
One response: Then don't use sequences.
--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Thu Dec 02 2004 - 15:11:52 CST
