Contrary to popular belief Oracle FailSafe for MSCS works quite well
and is very stable. Once set up Failover can happen in as little 1
minute. If you are looking at a DR solution then DG would be a viable
alternative. But if you are looking at either an active:active or
active:passive cluster configuration FS for MSCS will fit your bill.
DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1098550622.293470_at_yasure>...
> Vilakooran wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the info on Dataguard.
> >
> > Sorry, I should have marked the subject as "Oracle 10g database under
> > Windows Server 2003 Cluster".
> >
> > The use of W2K3 OS with MSCS was inspired by the following article:
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/clustering/confclus.mspx
> >
> > I was thinking more in terms of having a high availability solution
> > without using Oracle cluster technology.
> >
> > I could not find any usage of this method. Any ideas are most welcome.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I would suggest you look at Oracle's DataGuard.
>
> And moving from Windoze to Linux will give you far more performance and
> scalability on the same hardware.
Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:19:32 CDT
