Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: oracle817 + fedora2 is it possible ?

Re: oracle817 + fedora2 is it possible ?

From: Howard J. Rogers <hjr_at_dizwell.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:01:48 +1000
Message-ID: <40dc140e$0$18666$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


Dare one ask why this combination?

It's all well and good experimenting with non-supported combinations of things. We generally learn lots by doing so. But it does strike me as a bit ambitious to pit a practically archaic Oracle version against a practically beta operating system. There are more sensible combinations that are do-able with much less fuss (8i with RH8 or RH9, for example; or 10g and FC1 or FC2).

The phrase 'new wine in old wine skins' springs to mind. Or in your case, perhaps the other way around. In either case, it gets messy. Or tasteless.

Regards
HJR "krzys" <krzys1825_at_NOSPAMgazeta.pl> wrote in message news:cbh3tn$dui$1_at_inews.gazeta.pl...
> I try to install very old ;) oracle server 8.1.7 on quite new ;) Feodra
> Core 2. It has been taken me over 3 hours but still I can't start this
> wonderful universal installer. when I run ./runInstaller the message
> appears:
>
> Initializing Java Virtual Machine from /usr/lib/jre118/bin/jre. Please
> wait...
> [oracle_at_eger Disk1]$ /usr/lib/jre118/bin/../bin/i686/native_threads/jre:
> relocation error:
> /usr/lib/jre118/bin/../lib/i686/native_threads/libjava.so: symbol
> __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link
> time reference
>
> I read there are many problems with new versions of time libraries.
> Maybe one of You solved this kind of problem ??
>
> PS.
> I've already tried to add
> export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 ( or 2.4.18 or 2.4.19)
> it doesn't help :(
>
> thanks in advance
>
> K.
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Jun 25 2004 - 07:01:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US