Frank wrote:
> Volker Hetzer wrote:
>
>> "Frank" <fbortel_at_nescape.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:bq5pa7$bnj$1_at_news1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl...
>>
>>> Volker Hetzer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Frank" <fbortel_at_nescape.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>>> news:bq34ho$qr$1_at_news4.tilbu1.nb.home.nl...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What if you have customers that wish your product to run
>>>>> on a variaty of backends?
>>>>> Makes sense to put (1 version!) of the business rules in
>>>>> the middle tier to me. Use the database just as a pool of data;
>>>>> no logic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What if they wish to use a variety of middle tiers?
>>>>
>>>> Greetings!
>>>> Volker
>>>
>>>
>>> I tell 'm I don't do that ;-)
>>> Seriously - the customer can have any middle tier as long as
>>> it's black - sorry, Java.
>>>
>>> The background of all this is simply a matter of
>>> development cost - it's cheaper (at least, thought to
>>> be!) to develop the logic in one flavour (Java), than in,
>>> say two or three (Oracle: PL/SQL, SQL Server: TSQL, DB2/MySQL/...)
>>
>>
>> But look, who prevents the developer from using java stored procedures
>> in the db if he wants to use java? That's no reason to do an app server!
>>
>> Greetings!
>> Volker
>
> SQL Server has Java in the db? Since when.
> And Orace seems to have plans to remove it from the db.
>
Oracle is deprecating SQLJ ... there is no move to remove Java in any
other form. I expect Java, in the form of JDeveloper will be alive an
healthy for a very long time.
--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Fri Nov 28 2003 - 11:35:59 CST
