Re: RFD: Periodic FAQ & Charter post

regarding the length

it could have a short summary followed by details

• mcs "Pete Finnigan" <plsql_at_petefinnigan.com> wrote in message news:p7pKWWB5d1x$QxSV_at_peterfinnigan.demon.co.uk...
  | Hi Hans,
  |
  | I did read it to the end!, i just wanted to say thanks to you quickly
  | for putting this together and that it is a very good idea.
  |
  | What about Jonathan's already irregular post on slightly similar lines
  | for the FAQ? - Also I see that Mark has volunteered already to post the
  | emails, thanks Mark.
  |
  | My view is that the content should be as short as possible, we don't
  | know who will take the time to read it..:-(, the shorter it is i suppose
  | the bigger chance there is someone would read it, or is that wishful
  | reasoning. Whether even after they have read it they will take note of
  | it is another thing..:-), but it is worth doing.
  |
  | maintenance of the content should be by consensus - if not all of the
  | group then at least an elected few - it doesn't need to be the person
  | who will post it?
  |
  | Kind regards
  |
  | Pete
  | --
  | Pete Finnigan
  | email:pete_at_petefinnigan.com
  | Web site: http://www.petefinnigan.com - Oracle security audit specialists
  | Book:Oracle security step-by-step Guide - see http://store.sans.org for
  details.