--
"(Pete Cresswell)" <x_at_y.z> wrote in message
news:32atrvsq3c3hjkc8ngt1l47v7qdv11p9eg_at_4ax.com...
> RE/
> >some take this stand for portability -- stored procedures must be
written,
> >at least partially, in a proprietary language that is not portable across
> >databases
> >
> >so what's the target deployment environment(s)?
>
> This app has more stored procedures than Carter has liver pills. My take
would
> be that eliminating triggers hasn't reduced the numbe of SPs by more than
a few
> percent.
> --
> PeteCresswell
They have stored procedures (or any PlSql), but they don't want any triggers
under any condition ?
That's an odd one.
Received on Sun Nov 23 2003 - 12:16:36 CST
