Re: Cross Post DATABASE QUESTION

From: Rob Verschoor <rob_at_DO.NOT.SPAM.sypron.nl.REMOVE.THIS.DECOY>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:30:30 +0200
Message-ID: <3edf0077$0$28909$1b62eedf@news.euronet.nl>

"Rauf Sarwar" <rs_arwar_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:92eeeff0.0306042257.2e67e54e_at_posting.google.com... > "Ken Johnsen" <kjohnsen_at_si.rr.cccom> wrote in message news:<qmuDa.97959$h42.81954_at_twister.nyc.rr.com>...
> > "KULJEET" <kuljeet_twtpl_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:febbed51.0306040517.71e25bf6_at_posting.google.com...
> > > PupppyWizzard_at_glay.org (Pupppy Wizzard) wrote in message
> > news:<8dcf2300.0306040207.1aa53dcc_at_posting.google.com>...
> > > > Hi. We are setting up a new database. We previously used MS
Access,
> > > > but we want something better.
> > > >
> > > > What would be a good choice for a company with 300 employees
from:
> > > >
> > > > MS SQL SERVER
> > > > Oracle
> > > > Sybase
> > > > MySQL
> > > > Paradox
> > > >
> > > > -Jer
> > >
> > > choose oracle only.

>
>
> If you want "something better" then the best RDBMS out of the list

is
> Oracle. However, if you want to leverage your existing MS Access > skillset and do not want to spend time and money to learn Oracle, then

> go with SQL Server.
>
> Regards
> /Rauf Sarwar

Oracle may be "better", but if you're looking for "someting really good", choose Sybase ASE.

HTH, Rob V.
rob_at_DO.NOT.SPAM.sypron.nl.REMOVE.THIS.DECOY Received on Thu Jun 05 2003 - 03:30:30 CDT